Mosaics

Friday, December 28, 2012

Paula's Grandma Lena's Cold and Flu Medicine

FLAX SEED TEA
Per 1 cup of almost boiling hot water steep 1 tsp of freshly ground dark flax seed for 5 to 15 minutes. Strain.
Add tsp of lemon juice
and 1 tsp of honey cinnamon blend (see below)
Add more honey to taste if desired.
Sip throughout day as desired.

Knocks a cold or flu virus right out of ya! My cold lived for 3 days. Poor sucker didn't have a chance.
I usually make it by the pitcher and keep it in the fridge to heat up in the microwave when we wish to use it. I also have us take about 3 Tbsp a day to keep us in good health when we are not ill.
And for those who do not wish to waste anything, the strained flax seeds are an excellent addition to hot cereal. Keep in fridge to use as desired within the week.

HONEY CINNAMON BLEND
2 parts honey
1 part cinnamon
I make about a cup worth and keep to use to put in my coffee, tea, oatmeal and on toast. Needs no refrigeration.
Not only does it help get rid of illness, but a tsp a day is a good preventative medicine.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

How can a Gift Card be a great personal gift?

Let's be creative with Gift Cards this year! 
Challenge yourself.

Giving and receiving gift cards can seem impersonal, but if you look at the big scheme of things, they are not. I suspect that most of us love to get them for then we don't have useless stuff hanging around. They allow the giver to be less stressed, and then they are able to more freely give the gift of self during this time which we all have to admit is usually stress-filled. Yet many of us have a sort of uncomfortable feeling when it comes to wrapping all the gifts, and we look at that thin piece of plastic we are going to present to our loved one. It just seems so impersonal.

But it doesn't have to be this way at all. With the right touch, a gift card can be a much more personal gift then giving that wonderful scent you love to the aunt whom it escaped your notice never wears perfume, or those slippers for your nephew who loves going barefoot.

Be the one to start a 'creative gift card giving' frame of mind to your family. Challenge and inspire others to do so also.

Thoughts:

  • Give a gift card to a clothing store attached to a hand wrapped hanger with a potpourri bag.
  • A gift card to a restaurant for a teen that doesn't drive yet for date night with the 'chauffeur service'.
  • No teenager who does drive has said no to a gas station gift card, put it in a card that states there will be free vacuuming of the car by the gift owner (if one has the stomach such a thing), or maybe attach it to a tire gauge or wrap it in a chamois cloth.
  • Have a reader in your family? Make a bookmark and give with a gift card to a bookstore (or if you draw my name, you can pay off my library fines).
  • For mother or mother-in-law, a gift card to a store that she likes with a promise of driving, accompanying her shopping and then taking her out for lunch. Maybe even a picnic when the weather is warm again, if she wishes to wait that long to use that card.
  • A gift card to a favorite gardening store tucked in a homemade gardener's tool belt.
  • A card to your handyman's favorite hardware store with a bar of homemade super scrubber soap.
  • Your fisherman's gift card to his favorite bait shop could be tucked inside a thermal-gel can holder, your hunter's gift card could be wrapped up with some homemade targets for practice, your golfer's gift card could be tucked in with some tees.
  • Does your card receiver spend time out in the cold? Grab a couple of those insta-heat hand or feet warmers.
  • Do they have a fun sense of humor? Wrap it up with fun socks, or maybe a bottle of bubbles.
  • No young parenting couple will complain about getting that gift card to a nice restaurant tucked in with a homemade gift certificate for free babysitting.

So personalize that card because gift cards won't be boring if you aren't.
See what you can come up with.

Sunday, August 31, 2008

An open letter to my cousins

Hello dear cousins!
I'm going to be adding this blog as a link to the new website for us. In doing so I thought it best that I'd warn all of you that many of you may not like my stance on certain matters expressed here, especially regarding politics and religion. But hey, if all us Croteaus held the same beliefs, our debates would be rather dull.

Actually, now that I think about it, I doubt we would ever let it get to that point, would we? Instead of allowing our debates to be rather dull, some of us would probably take on stances which we do not believe in just to play the devil's advocate. I dare say, this has already happened.

So dear cousins, as you read this blog, please know that there are many flavors in my posts. If you do not like one, try another.

And now that I have this linked to a website, I just may get back on to posting more "mosaic writing".

xoxo

Friday, August 18, 2006

A Man of Great Courage

This young man is an example of what our Catholic Colleges SHOULD be putting out, however as you can hear, it is an unfortunate truth that he is not the norm, but the exception. Instead of getting a standing ovation as was deserved (tho there are those that did give him an ovation at the end), the speaker, University of St Thomas's 2006 Tommie of the Year, Ben Kessler, had people walking out on him. I could understand the reaction if this were a public institution, but this is a private Catholic university with the following mission statement:
“Inspired by Catholic intellectual tradition, the University of St. Thomas educates students to be morally responsible leaders who think critically, act wisely and work skillfully to advance the common good.” Everything in this young man's speech reflects this mission statement.

Notice at the end how the speaker thanks Ben for the courage of speaking his "thoughts", not for the courage of speaking "Catholic teaching", teaching that all Catholics should know and follow, and not be shocked or upset by. Although many of these students are not Catholic, they should not be so offended by hearing basic Catholic doctrine spoken at their Catholic University.

Unfortunately the University of St Thomas's president, Fr. Dennis Dease, gave an apology for this speech, and required Ben Kessler to also give an apology. I do not know why since Mr. Kessler's speech proves that he is exactly what the mission statement claims the University desires to produce.

Please note that this is merely a 6 minute excerpt of a longer speech made, that this was simply a part of what was said and not the focus of the speech, but rather an example of the focus which was that the graduates should go out into the world with the intent to change it for the Common Good, leaving selfishness behind, in the same tradition of Martin Luther King Jr, Ghandi, and yes, even Jesus who all Christians are supposed to desire to emulate.

(Caution, foul language can be heard on the recording)



If anyone else gives a hoot about this, please write Fr. Dennis Dease at the University of St. Thomas, 2115 Summit Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55105

Monday, August 07, 2006

Raising up Terri, at least in my blog

This is a bit postdated, but the topic I believe is still something we deal with. I came across this doing some internet reading. It's just another example of how we as a public tend to swallow too easily that which is fed us as truth when the truth is indeed something entirely different.

Many of us saw polls that came out during the Terri Schiavo fiasco that were held up as proof that the majority of people supported denying her food and water (not that majority belief would still make it right, for what is right and true is not a matter of what is popular public opinion), but how many of us saw this poll which did not ask tainted questions on the matter to get the answers desired by those that supported the denial of food and water?

LifeNews
April 1, 2005
Steven Ertelt

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Polls leading up to the death of Terri Schiavo made it appear Americans had formed a consensus in favor of ending her life. However, a new Zogby poll with fairer questions shows the nation clearly supporting Terri and her parents and wanting to protect the lives of other disabled patients.

The Zogby poll found that, if a person becomes incapacitated and has not expressed their preference for medical treatment, as in Terri's case, 43 percent say "the law presume that the person wants to live, even if the person is receiving food and water through a tube" while just 30 percent disagree.

Another Zogby question his directly on Terri's circumstances.

"If a disabled person is not terminally ill, not in a coma, and not being kept alive on life support, and they have no written directive, should or should they not be denied food and water," the poll asked.

A whopping 79 percent said the patient should not have food and water taken away while just 9 percent said yes.

"From the very start of this debate, Americans have sat on one of two sides," Concerned Women for America's Lanier Swann said in response to the poll. One side "believes Terri's life has worth and purpose, and the side who saw Michael Schiavo's actions as merciful, and appropriate."

More than three-fourths of Americans agreed, Swann said, "because a person is disabled, that patient should never be denied food and water."

The poll also lent support to members of Congress to who passed legislation seeking to prevent Terri's starvation death and help her parents take their lawsuit to federal courts.

"When there is conflicting evidence on whether or not a patient would want to be on a feeding tube, should elected officials order that a feeding tube be removed or should they order that it remain in place," respondents were asked.

Some 18 percent said the feeding tube should be removed and 42 percent said it should remain in place.

Swann said her group would encourage Congress to adopt legislation that would federal courts to review cases when the medical treatment desire of individuals is not known and the patient's family has a dispute over the care.

"According to these poll results, many Americans do in fact agree with what we're trying to accomplish," she said.

The poll found that 49 percent of Americans believe there should be exceptions to the right of a spouse to act as a guardian for an incapacitated spouse. Only 39 percent disagreed.

When asked directly about Terri's case and told the her estranged husband Michael "has had a girlfriend for 10 years and has two children with her" 56 percent of Americans believed guardianship should have been turned over to Terri's parents while 37 percent disagreed.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

"Keep your rosaries off my ovaries"

This slogan, if read by anyone with intelligence, is really self-defeating for it's purpose.
Think about it:
"Keep your rosaries off my ovaries"

Those that flaunt this slogan may claim they are telling us to not force our morals on them (which is silly since all laws are a matter of forcing moral views on others, name me one that is not), but that is a weak way to make such a statement.

What is really being said by this slogan is very clear: "Don't pray for my fertility" or "stop praying for abortion to become illegal". Those that have items with this statement have to admit that with this statement they are telling us not to pray for them or in regards to the abortion matters. It is undeniable. It is very clear.

Stop praying.

Think about it.

What is wrong with praying for abortion to become illegal if it is as right and good as prochoice advocates claim for it to be? How could prayer harm their stance? What is there for them to fear or feel threatened about prayer, if what they support is right?

God does not support wrong things even if we pray for them to happen, and no prayer is wasted.

So if the proabortion advocate believes in God, and they believe abortion rights for women is a good and correct thing, then they should believe that prayer regarding abortion, either for or against it, will only help their cause.
If a person came up to me and said that they were praying for the prolife movement to become extinct, I would say "go right ahead" (for the prolife movement to become extinct would simply mean it would not be needed anymore...and what a wonderful world that would be). If abortion were illegal, and there was a movement that was praying to God for it to become legal, I would think them sadly misled, but I would not discourage them from praying (though I may try to sway them from their misled belief's about abortion), rather I would encourage them to continue praying. For all prayer is good and heard, and I know that God would only answer their prayers by working within their hearts to see the Truth. I would not see their prayer as counterproductive to my stance at all. For God only supports that which is right and good and True.

So the people who are proabortion and believe in God, and take offense to my rosaries regarding abortion, are making a profound statement that they do not believe abortion is right and good, that my prayers are a threat to them.

But what about the people who claim to not believe in God?
Well quite frankly, if my rosaries offend them, then deep down, they are not as atheistic as they think they are. For to real atheists, my rosaries are simple wastes of time, and people are not offended or threatened by simple wastes of time.

No, the bumperstickers and t-shirts that state "Keep your rosaries off my ovaries" are a definate sign that my rosaries are effective, and a good reminder to me that I should continue saying them. After all, we all know who hates and fears prayer the most.

As for that slogan offending me, it does not in the least. It simply makes me very sad that the woman showing it on her car or chest has bought into the lie. And the fact that she choses to advertise such a slogan simply states that her conscience bugs her and she is working on deadening it, or that she has chosen to serve the evil one.

So I then pray a rosary specifically for her.

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

Last minute Lenten lecture

This Easter time, it is my duty as a good Christian to remind others that if you desire to continue being a Catholic in good standing, you are to go to the Sacrament of Penance & Reconciliation (if you have committed mortal sin) and Mass.

As Catholics we are required to go to Reconciliation (if we have commited grave (aka Mortal) sin) only one time a year, and we are required to receive Eucharist only one time a year, recommended on Easter. It really is not much of a requirement, but too often neglected. Seeing that we are not to receive the Eucharist with grave sin on our souls, it only makes sense that if we only go to confession once a year, it should be before our annual reception of the Eucharist. (Why a person would willingly stay away from the Eucharist after understanding all that it Truly is, except for once a year, is not within my heart's comprehension...but that is another schpiel, a lecture for another day.)

Considering that this is food for our souls, once a year is practically starving our souls.

I feel fairly confident that most people are open enough to consider going to Mass on Easter Sunday.

Reconciliation though is another matter.

I have discussed Reconciliation with many Catholics and know that many have questions regarding the necessity of going to a priest. I understand the belief that one should only need to go to God, sorrowful of their sins, that meeting with a priest is unnecessary, and that God can and does forgive us on His own, that He doesn't need any human, priest or otherwise to forgive us. And on the surface this makes perfect sense.

But if we delve deeper into the matter with an open heart to God, we realize that this is not a safe practice at all. For one thing, Jesus did not establish the Sacrament of Reconciliaton because He needed a priest to be able to give us His forgiveness. He established the Sacrament because our sins are committed because we have a physical body and we are the ones that need the physical interaction to truly seek His forgiveness in the manner which we need to in order to receive His forgiveness. His forgiveness is always there, it was there from the moment of His Passion on the Cross and therefore it was (and is) there before we even committed the sin. Sins we haven't even committed yet, are forgiven already. So it is the ability to receive this forgiveness that is what is needed from us now.

One very easy point to look at is, do we really set aside time to talk to God about our sins and ask Him for His forgiveness? And if so, do we do a thorough examination of conscience, recollecting our actions that we know are sinful? What most of us do rather, is say a quick "sorry God" after we do an action that we realize is sinful and we regret. We do not approach God and say we are sorry for things that we know are wrong, are sorry for, but don't really want to stop doing. We are not held 'to task' when confiding to no one but ourselves and a nonphysically present God. Sometimes we may lie in bed and regret an action or actions more deeply, and this brings us to a good conversation with God, which is good. But it is a rare person who sets a time apart and examines one's conscience, actively seeking to remember that which we have done which is offensive to God and seperates us from Him. Sins unremembered cannot be repented, so they still separate us from God until we seek forgiveness for them.

Another point is that Jesus has told us "For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." Matthew 18:20
With this verse we should be able to recognize that it is better to go to the Sacrament of Reconciliation as opposed to confessing alone, in our heart.

I had a conversation with a priest recently about how most people who no longer go to Reconciliation stopped going at the age of 14 (as I myself had). His response was that he believed that that is the age of a more adult awareness. When we realize that we are making willful choices that we know are wrong. He also stated that it is a source of embarrassment to admit to another person that we have done wrong.

He then stated that he ' wished people would realize that it isn't him as a human sitting there listening to what other people are saying, that by doing the proper preparation required by him before confession, he himself is in an intense Sacramental state, and even if he was allowed to tell others what he heard in the confessional, he would not be able to remember if his life depended on it, for the preparation he does puts him in an intense Sacramental state so that he is able to sit there in Jesus' stead, though he is still conscious of his actions, he is acting on Jesus behalf in a deeply Sacramental way.'

This hit home with me, I realized that we are indeed in direct communication with God in this Sacrament.



Too often I have spoken to others about this matter and felt unable to respond to their belief that participating in the Sacrament of Reconciliation is reall not that important. I have often been only able to respond that I could not really explain why going to confession with a priest was necessary, but that over time, I have come to realize that it is. I then have requested that they would consider trusting my judgement on the matter. But even as I would make that request, I realized it was not enough. It wasn't enough for me either, when I believed as they.

I have since done more study on the matter in hopes that one day I will again have a discussion regarding the importance of Reconciliation, and I would be better able to support the Church's standing.

The most important thing I have come across is the fact that Confession is a Sacrament. A Sacrament is an extraordinary Grace which is a physical earthly interaction from God, with us. In other words: in the Sacrament of Reconciliation, Jesus is there, using the priest as a vessal, to physically hear our words and to physically say to you "I absolve you". In fact, because this is a Sacrament, what goes on in the Confessional is no different then if Jesus was indeed physically appearing before us and we could physically touch him and hear these words directly from His own voice.

How this is different from when we approach Jesus with our sins quietly and in our own hearts alone is, even if we do say the words out loud, we do not hear with our physical ears the words that Jesus says. Jesus is with us spiritually, yes, but we cannot hear Him, we have no physical connection. Because the sins we commit are due to having a physical body, we need to have a physical connection when we confess our sins to God. This is only done through the Sacrament of Reconciliation.

Jesus recognized this, which is why He gave His Apostles the ability to forgive or retain sins. He did not give this ability to any of His other disciples, it was only to His Apostles. This was a definate distribution of an actual power from the Holy Spirit that Jesus chose not just anyone to have.


Here is an excerpt taken from the website:
"The 40 Questions Most Frequently Asked About The Catholic Church By Non-Catholics"

http://mafg.home.isp-direct.com/que40fwd.htm


22. Why Not Confess to God Instead of to a Mere Man?

Why is it Catholics go to confession to a mere man in order to confess their sins? Is it not easier to go directly to God?
Yes, it is easier to go to God, and probably this is why Christ did not chose this method.

We confess to a man, not because he himself has the power to forgive sins, but because he acts as an agent, or a judge, in the name of God, and forgives sins in His name.

The words of institution prove that Christ intended specific confession of sins:


"He, therefore, said to them again, 'Peace be to you! As the Father has sent me, I also send you.' When He had said this, He breathed upon them and said to them, 'Receive the Holy Spirit; whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them, whose sins you shall retain, they are retained'." St. John 20:21, 22


By these words Christ gave to His Apostles the power EITHER to forgive OR to retain. In order to exercise this judicial power it is necessary for the sinner to accuse himself specifically of his sins. Most sins are committed in secret and the priest-judge would have no other way of knowing these sins, except by specific confession.
Furthermore, the priest as a judge must give a penance or work of satisfaction which is proportionate to the sins and helpful to the sinner. This he can do only if he knows what sins have been committed.

The fact that the priest is a sinner, as are all men, does not affect the power which he exercises. The power comes to him from his office. The same is true with a President or with a judge in our civil courts. The private lives of these individuals does not affect the authority which they have under the Constitution."


The other factor that comes with this being a Sacrament, is that through Sacraments, God has chosen to give us extraordinary Graces which draws us closer to Him. Every time we participate in a Sacrament, we have grown closer to God. In the Sacrament of Reconciliation, we receive an additional Grace from God which helps us to avoid our favorite sins. After Confession, when we are about to sin again, our spiritual ears deep in our hearts hear the voice of God warning us of the danger of what we are about to do and that we should not do it. It becomes more of an act of will to commit the sin again. This helps us to indeed 'go and sin no more'. I have experienced this myself, but have never noticed it until I heard Fr. Corapi talk about it. Now that I am aware of it, I recognize it, and it affects me even more fully.

The first time I was able to recognize this Grace happening to me, actually took me by surprise, and I have to admit, I was actually a bit irked that it happened. I was about to tell a very trivial little lie, of no real consequence, so I thought. But the voice deep within, was totally unbidden and it told me that it was of consequence. And then I realized that it was definately an act of will on my part to sin, and I couldn't just run to the confessional and report it without acknowledging fully it was an act of will on my part. And in choosing to sin, I make a willful choice to be apart from God. How can that possibly be good? Everything that is good in my life has been given to me by God.

In other words, I have become much more aware of my actions. And I have become much more aware of my own control. And in this world of everything spinning out of control, becoming more aware of that which we do control is very powerful, and liberating. So although at first it annoyed me to be able to hear that little spiritual voice of God telling me that saying that little lie I was about to say, was a sin and did I really want to do that, I have been finding myself very grateful for it. For now I have more control of my will, I am not a servant to my whims of sinful behavior. And this way I am able to become a better person and to have a closer relationship with God and those around me.

Well that is my preaching for the day. I hope you stuck with me on this and read it all the way through.

If you choose not to go to confession before Easter Mass, please at least consider doing a full reviewal, an Examination of Conscience, so that you may be able to truly seek God's forgiveness on your own by spending some time in conversation with Him with full knowledge and sorrow, which is required for God's forgiveness. Here is a website connection that has a very good examination of conscience.

Please note that all the sins listed on the first part here are Mortal sins, and if one has participated in them one must confess them truly to God. The fact that some of these sins are considered "Mortal" may surprise many, for often we do these things thinking they are not so bad. But indeed they are Mortal, and if one wishes to receive the Sacrament of the Eucharist, one needs to go to the Sacrament of Reconciliation and confess the Mortal sins.

"So if anyone eats this bread or drinks this cup of the Lord unworthily, that person is guilty of sinning against the body and the blood of the Lord. That is why you should examine yourself before eating the bread and drinking from the cup." 1 Cor 11:27,28

Not to mention that it is neither fair or right to accept one Sacrament of the Church and deny the other.

If one is truly sorry for one's sins, one will be willing to make this extra effort to go to Confession. If you are not truly sorry for your sins, then please, I pray that you do not compound your sins more by choosing to receive the Body of Christ unworthily. It harms you much more then you realize.

Here is Fr. Altier's Examination of Conscience
www.catholicparents.org/oxcart/Examination%20of%20Conscience.pdf

This is another one that I thought was very good also. It includes the Act of Contrition prayer, though most confessionals already have a printed copy so you can just read it when asked.
www.scborromeo.org/confess.htm

If you do make a choice to go to Reconciliation, you may want to consider doing what I find works for me. I examine my conscience and write down on a little paper what I need to confess. Then I go in say "bless me Fr. for I have sinned. My last confession was blah blah blah" then I tell Fr. I have made a thorough examination and have written it down on a list, which I then read.

Please bear in mind also that many churches, for some reason, do not have the Sacrament of Reconciliation over Triduum (Thursday, Friday, Saturday), so look into going to Reconciliation as soon as possible if you wish to do so before Easter. You can also call and make an appointment, they are supposed to agree to meet you anonymously if you request to do so, behind screen.

Well I sure hope you made it this far with me. If you have, thank you very much for giving me your respect. I respect that these choices are your own and only you can make them. I hope though that you will continue to allow me to share that which I learn about such things.


" For I received from the Lord what I also handed on to you, that the Lord Jesus, on the night he was handed over, took bread, and, after he had given thanks, broke it and said, "This is my body that is for you. Do this in remembrance of me." In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me." For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord until he comes. Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will have to answer for the body and blood of the Lord. A person should examine himself, and so eat the bread and drink the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment on himself. That is why many among you are ill and infirm, and a considerable number are dying." 1 Cor 11:11-30